5 Comments
User's avatar
Ruth Watson's avatar

Not sure the thesis stands up to rational scrutiny — and a town cannot be laconic. But I enjoyed the read.

Expand full comment
Alexandra Sara's avatar

The inhabitants didn't really speak to one another?

Expand full comment
Ruth Watson's avatar

Not sure of your point? Laconic means speaking concisely or briefly. Townspeople might speak thus but not bricks and mortar.

Expand full comment
Alexandra Sara's avatar

I was just responding to your comment :) I know what laconic means and that word jarred for me too. I thought the writer might be trying to find an adjective to describe a town in the same way we might say that it was 'sleepy' or 'bustling' which obviously doesn't refer to the bricks and mortar. Maybe the town is concise in words to the point of curtness / impoliteness? But that might be a stretch, I don't know, was just responding to your observation.

Expand full comment
alex's avatar

this is one of very few Vittles essays I have found a bit drab and unconvincing, more a lay of the land of white australian food culture than anything more insightful.

Expand full comment